Showing posts with label Contract Negotiations 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Contract Negotiations 2016. Show all posts
Friday, November 18, 2016
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Negotiations Update
| Last Thursday, over 170 members gathered enthusiastically on the University Campus in support of the SHARE negotiating team |
| Rad Tech Rich Leufstedt and his banjo perform his song "SHARE Contract Song 2016" at the University Campus gathering |
Members of the SHARE Negotiating Team continue to meet with hospital management to reach agreement for our next contract. We are still talking about raises. We have two more negotiating sessions scheduled this week, on Thursday and Friday, where our conversations will be mediated by Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld.
Keep your eyes on the blog. We'll post another update and more information soon . . .
| And! Last Friday, more than 70 SHARE members came out strong at 306 Belmont Street |
Friday, November 4, 2016
Memorial SHARE Members Come Out Singing for a Strong Contract
The Memorial Amphitheater played host today to SHARE members who got an update about negotiations, and shared some laughs and smiles in support of our negotiating team. So fun!
We have a couple more gatherings lined up next week. Please join us if you can.
- University Campus (Old Medical School Lobby, by the book store) Wednesday, November 9, 12:15-12:30
- 306 Belmont (Cafeteria) Thursday, November 10, 12:15-12:30
Friday, October 14, 2016
Contract Negotiations Update: Getting Close
The good news is that SHARE and UMass Memorial have finished, or mostly finished, the vast majority of issues that we have been discussing. Now we are talking about raises and a couple other tough issues.
As we described here, most of the side tables in our Interest Based Bargaining negotiations have reported out how they propose to resolve their issue to the main negotiating table. Many of the tables were able to come up with proposals that both union and management are satisfied with. In some cases, they were able to propose something that both sides are excited about -- such as the side table talking about unit-based teams.
Raises, plus any other issue that costs money, are usually the last topic that gets resolved in negotiations. Right now, from SHARE's point of view, the numbers that management is thinking about are too low, so we have to keep working on it. From management's point of view, there are big financial challenges coming in 2017:
Of course, when we do come to an agreement, you will be the first to know!
As we described here, most of the side tables in our Interest Based Bargaining negotiations have reported out how they propose to resolve their issue to the main negotiating table. Many of the tables were able to come up with proposals that both union and management are satisfied with. In some cases, they were able to propose something that both sides are excited about -- such as the side table talking about unit-based teams.
Raises, plus any other issue that costs money, are usually the last topic that gets resolved in negotiations. Right now, from SHARE's point of view, the numbers that management is thinking about are too low, so we have to keep working on it. From management's point of view, there are big financial challenges coming in 2017:
- Possible Medicaid cuts of $20-25 million
- Medicare cuts of $16 million for UMass Memorial, for taking care of the same number of patients
Of course, when we do come to an agreement, you will be the first to know!
2100 Signatures, Poster Power, and Negotiations
Our
negotiations updates wouldn’t be complete if they didn’t touch on the fantastic
success of the SHARE 2016 Signature Poster. We had a great time
celebrating at the “Post Your Poster” events, and it’s exciting to see the
large posters hanging in departments throughout the system, and the smaller
versions hanging in work spaces all over. (If you’d like to print a small version, click here.)
SHARE members signed onto the goals of our 2016 contract negotiations: To improve the day-to-day experience of SHARE members at work.
Through individual conversations, and many information meetings, SHARE organizers, Negotiating Team, and Reps worked hard to talk with every member. This gives the SHARE negotiators the experiences, opinions and support of hundreds of members to draw on as we talk with management negotiators. The poster now stands as a beautiful visual representation of that collective knowledge and support.
This isn’t the first time that SHARE has created a signature poster at negotiations-time. It’s always an inspiring moment to unveil the many names of our members alongside one another. The SHARE 2016 Signature Poster is bigger than ever: 2100 SHARE members! That's 80% of the employees currently in SHARE.
The poster is an impressive gift that SHARE members give to one another to show that we are standing together. We also delivered posters to the individuals on the management negotiating team, as a clear indication that SHARE members support the priorities that the SHARE Negotiating Team is bringing to the table.
Management's Response Reflects our Changing Relationship
Perhaps because we’re using a model of Interest-Based Bargaining in Negotiations, we found that members of the management team welcomed the posters, and were happy to have them hanging in their departments. In our negotiations, there’s broad agreement around the idea that employees need to be directly involved in improving our hospital, and welcomed into important decision-making processes. Although we’ve still got lots of work to do to make those ideas a reality, we take the enthusiasm around our poster as a meaningful sign of things to come.
Also different this time around: SHARE is now on Facebook! Connect with us there, where the poster serves as the backdrop for smiling SHARE faces, and share your support for your union on your own social media profiles. Check out the SHARE Facebook page SHARE Hospital 2016 Negotiations.
SHARE members signed onto the goals of our 2016 contract negotiations: To improve the day-to-day experience of SHARE members at work.
Through individual conversations, and many information meetings, SHARE organizers, Negotiating Team, and Reps worked hard to talk with every member. This gives the SHARE negotiators the experiences, opinions and support of hundreds of members to draw on as we talk with management negotiators. The poster now stands as a beautiful visual representation of that collective knowledge and support.
Management's Response Reflects our Changing Relationship
Perhaps because we’re using a model of Interest-Based Bargaining in Negotiations, we found that members of the management team welcomed the posters, and were happy to have them hanging in their departments. In our negotiations, there’s broad agreement around the idea that employees need to be directly involved in improving our hospital, and welcomed into important decision-making processes. Although we’ve still got lots of work to do to make those ideas a reality, we take the enthusiasm around our poster as a meaningful sign of things to come.
Contract Negotiations: Weeks 8-10
Things are moving. As groups continue to present to the main table, we're finding that the side-table structure we developed for this negotiations has moved a lot of ideas forward, relatively quickly.
Most commonly, these joint union-management groups have reached a consensus that the participants feel good about. Often those involved have been surprised to have crafted options that they couldn’t have foreseen. We have uncovered a lot of overlapping interests as we compare perspectives.
Of course, the details get complicated. Some side tables have worked to develop promising options, only to realize that, for one reason or another, they turned out to be unfeasible.
Predictably, not all of the issues have resolved quickly, in spite of long hours and thoughtful work. Some recognize that they are unlikely to reach consensus around a single option, and have instead presented to the main table multiple ideas, some of which better represent the interests of one side, and others which represent the other.
Side-Table and Follow-Up Groups have reconvened with the Main Table to present interests and options around the following subjects:
- Unit-Based Teams and Culture
- Inpatient PCA Staffing Levels
- Career Development
- Process for Job Postings
- Call-Back and Sleep Policies
- Peer-Slotted Scales
- Pension Floor
- Leaves of Absence
- Absenteeism
- Cross-Campus Floating
- Discipline
- Work Security
- Documenting Department Policies
- A new vision for the relationship between managers & front-line members
- Staffing
- Wages
In any negotiations, “money issues” (including raises.) tend to get resolved at the very end, when the larger picture is more clear, and the costs better defined. We continue to work at those issues, and on those issues where our perspectives remain far from one another.
Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, the professor from Brandeis who coached both teams on Interest Based Bargaining methods, recently returned from a commitment in Australia. SHARE and hospital management asked him to resume his role as a neutral facilitator as we work to reach an overarching agreement.
Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, the professor from Brandeis who coached both teams on Interest Based Bargaining methods, recently returned from a commitment in Australia. SHARE and hospital management asked him to resume his role as a neutral facilitator as we work to reach an overarching agreement.
Friday, September 30, 2016
Negotiations Update: Contract Extended Through October 21st
You may have noticed that our current contract agreement with UMass Memorial is set to expire on this day. Both sides are still working to define the complete new agreement, and we're consistently moving things forward.
During today's negotiation session, both sides agreed to extend the current contract to allow for more of that work. Anyone in SHARE who's been around for a negotiations before will remember that we've extended our contract like this more often than not.
This extension runs through October 21st. We'll have a more thorough update about where we're at with negotiations on this blog very soon. More to come . . .
During today's negotiation session, both sides agreed to extend the current contract to allow for more of that work. Anyone in SHARE who's been around for a negotiations before will remember that we've extended our contract like this more often than not.
This extension runs through October 21st. We'll have a more thorough update about where we're at with negotiations on this blog very soon. More to come . . .
Saturday, September 17, 2016
SHARE and UMass Memorial Contract Negotiations: Weeks 6 & 7
Since our last post, we've met around the main negotiating table three days. In addition to those sessions, members of the negotiating teams have done related work in Follow-Up-Groups, Side Tables, and other meetings.
The main table has now begun discussing Work Security and Raises. We are not yet talking about dollar amounts or percentages at this point, but exchanging interests. We're making very clear to the management negotiating team that we're committed to developing new processes for making our hospital run better . . . but that the cost of those projects cannot be at the expense of good raises, that a financial commitment to each SHARE member is an essential show of confidence and sign of respect as we continue to talk about partnership.
Most recently, the main table discussed proposed ideas and options from the "Documenting Department Policies" Follow-Up-Group. And we had an introductory presentation from members of the "Teams and Culture" Side Table, in which they introduced the concept of the Unit Based Team (or UBT) as it exists at the Kaiser Permanente hospitals, and proposed some ideas about how UBT's might function at our hospital. For a look at UBT's in action, here's a three-minute video that we all watched:
Next week we'll be talking more about UBT's, and more. Stay tuned! See you at Post Your Poster!
Friday, September 16, 2016
*Post Your Poster* Events
We’re very excited to unveil the new poster that displays
our signatures and statement of priorities. It is a beautiful thing. Thank you
for making it happen! Please stop by at one of the following Post Your
Poster events with your friends and co-workers and pick up a copy for
your department.
SHARE 2016 Post Your Poster
Distribution Locations and Times
❤
Sept 19
(Mon)
– 11:30-1:30 Memorial Campus, Memorial 1 Conference Room
Sept 20
(Tues)
– 7:30-9:00 WBC, 5th Floor
Sept 20
(Tues)
– 11:30-1:30 University Campus,
old front entrance hallway by the Prescription Center
Sept 22
(Thurs)
– 11:30-1:30 Hahnemann Campus, 2nd floor conference room
(We are
booking a room at 306 Belmont as we speak.)
|
Before it shipped out for printing, 2,100 SHARE members
signed on to this show of support. That’s 80% of the SHARE-eligible
employees in our hospital’s largest union.
At each poster event listed above, we’ll have a large 2’ x
3’ poster that you and your co-workers can bring back to your department and
hang proudly.
We’d love to see everyone who can make it! Take your
picture with your co-workers. And show your support by posting your poster on
Facebook, Twitter, and your favorite social media websites.
LEARN MORE
Of course, we’ll talk in more detail at the Post Your
Poster events, and answer your questions. Our negotiating team is
working hard and fast on a wide range of interweaving issues. There’s still a
lot to do, but we’re optimistic about making new, meaningful improvements in
our workplace soon, and eager to talk with you about what’s happening around
the negotiating table.
We’ll continue posting updates regularly here on the SHARE blog. (Lately, we’ve been negotiating more frequently and
posting less. Most recently at the table, we discussed Unit Based Teams,
and will post about all of this and more very soon.)
THANK YOU
Thank you for supporting our negotiating team, our
hospital, and our ambitious efforts to improve the day-to-day at UMass
Memorial, both for employees and for patients.
SHARE and UMass Memorial Contract Negotiations: Week 5, Discipline
In a NUTSHELL
Wednesday, August 31st marked the SHARE Negotiating Team's fifth all-day contract negotiations session UMass Memorial.
We talked about the disciplinary process, and the problem-solving process. (The disciplinary steps are listed in the contract -- most people call it "being written up." They start with counseling, and go up to termination. The problem solving process is the steps that Human Resources and SHARE use to discuss and agree or disagree about the level of discipline that a SHARE member gets if their manager or the hospital thinks they did something wrong.)
In addition, members of the Peer-Slotted Scales side table reported back to the main table about options that could create more equity and clarity among the mostly techs job titles that are peer-slotted.
For more detail about this week's session, please read on.
DISCIPLINE
SHARE and management both wanted to talk about how to improve the disciplinary process. Management wanted to talk about timelines, and making sure the process keeps moving.
SHARE wants to bring some of the ideas from lean organizations to how we use discipline:
- Mistakes should be viewed as an opportunity to improve.
- Moving away from a "culture of shame and blame" and focusing more on fixing the systems that make it easy to make mistakes.
SHARE and UMass Memorial don't always agree about how much discipline a SHARE member should get. However, we find that we do have interests in common:
- Respect for SHARE members -- We talked about how to treat SHARE members whose performance or behavior is the subject of a disciplinary meeting.
- Interest-Based Processes -- We choose to try to resolve the problem and help the SHARE member and manager move forward, rather than to emphasize an adversarial approach.
- Keeping discipline as local and informal as possible, to help supervisors and SHARE employees resolve issues before they grow and get worse.
- Transparency and good communication between Human Resources and SHARE, especially when we disagree.
- Balancing the need for consistency in discipline with the flexibility to recognize the uniqueness of each person and each situation.
September Negotiations
SHARE and UMass Memorial both want to finish by the expiration of our contract, September 30th. (Of course, making sure the right things are in the contract is more important to SHARE than finishing on time!) We've agreed to add several more days of negotiations in September to try to meet our timeline.
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
Contract Negotiations 2016, Session 4: Staffing & Leaves of Absence
THIS WEEK, in a NUTSHELL
SHARE and UMass Memorial had their fourth contract negotiations session on Wednesday, August 24. This week, we focused on:
- Staffing. This is an issue that SHARE brought to the table. Front-line employees on our negotiating team explained the trend toward working with fewer hands in each department, and the frustrations and hazards of working with a thin crew. We discussed with management a range of possibilities for addressing that problem, as described in more detail below.
- Leaves of Absence (LOAs). This is an issue that management brought to the table. Managers described how many SHARE members take LOAs, and how difficult it is to staff a department when people are out. Of particular interest to management is that our hospital provides job protections beyond those mandated by the law, including protections for SHARE members who work less than 1250 hours each year. SHARE expressed a number of interests, including that we have always believed that part-time members--many of whom have family obligations or can't get full-time work in the hospital--should have full access to medical leaves and other benefits.
Read on for more detail . . .
WHAT DOES SHARE SAY about STAFFING?
If you’re reading this, you probably already know the answer. You’re working on the front lines yourself, and you know what your co-workers are saying. We presented to management facts from the most recent anonymous SHARE surveys, including:
- 41% of SHARE members disagree that staffing levels are adequate in their departments. That's 660 SHARE members.
- In all, SHARE members wrote nearly 500 comments in the survey expressing concern about their workload or staffing levels in their department. The SHARE Negotiating Team read aloud a couple dozen of these comments so that the management negotiating team could hear what SHARE members have to say. (We made sure all comments were anonymous, leaving out department details.)
Of course, SHARE recognizes that more staff cost money. We want our hospitals to be financially stable, and we don't want to go back to the days of substantial layoffs nearly every year. We also know that sometimes the problem isn't just the number of staff -- if you spend a bunch of your shift looking for linen, that's a system problem that needs to be fixed.
That said, many SHARE members who have been here for any length of time are now operating in departments that have seen significant decreases in staffing levels, and are now feeling the effects as the resulting stresses build up. Many people leave their shifts exhausted, and worried about what they might have missed because they were running so fast all day.
SHARE members don't know how the decisions are made about how many staff a department has, and we aren't part of those decisions. When decisions are made without us, they're made without all the information, which isn't good for us or the hospital.
SHARE members don't know how the decisions are made about how many staff a department has, and we aren't part of those decisions. When decisions are made without us, they're made without all the information, which isn't good for us or the hospital.
WHY IS MANAGEMENT CONCERNED about LEAVES of ABSENCE?
The management side listed the kinds of LOAs that a SHARE member might potentially take. They say that intermittent leaves create particular problems for department staffing, particularly when those leaves are taken unexpectedly. SHARE has made a number of data requests to better understand how often these leaves are being taken, and how changing any policies would actually affect staffing. The kinds of LOAs break down into two broad categories:
- Leaves regulated by State and Federal laws
- Massachusetts Personal Protected Leave (for reasons related to domestic violence)
- USERRA (for military leave)
- Massachusetts Small Necessities (for family care)
- Leaves granted by hospital policy or contractual bargaining agreement
- Company FMLA (or CFMLA)
- Extended Medical Leave
- Educational Leave
- Personal Leave
Members of the management team highlighted they’re focused on the systematic problems that result from these leaves. They recognize their legal obligations to protect jobs. They said that this discussion isn’t about calling into question the legitimacy of leave requests, but about addressing the staffing issues that result from leaves of absence.
SHARE pointed out that the issues of LOAs and staffing are linked. When departments are staffing with just enough staff, it's tough to run the department when people are out sick.
We’ll continue working on these issues through joint working groups, and be back at the table for negotiations next week. Stay tuned for more . . .
Friday, August 19, 2016
Documenting Department Policies -- Getting Rid of the Gray
SHARE members sometimes become frustrated by what they see as "gray areas" in the contract. In an attempt to fix some of these issues, SHARE has made a proposal in contract negotiations to systematize several department-level decisions in black-and-white.
Why the Gray?
SHARE represents almost two hundred job titles, in departments ranging from the tiny variety with two secretaries who work day shift, to enormous departments such as the Emergency Room, which has seventy-four SHARE members, in a variety of jobs, working shifts 24/7. That range leads to some complex challenges. For example, how do you write a vacation policy that would serve all those departments well, especially since they all start off with different ways of handling vacations?
SHARE's answer to that question is to emphasize the input of SHARE members in the department. The SHARE contract has always said that the way vacations are scheduled should be decided in the department, in discussions between the local SHARE members and the local managers. Our position has been that department policies will be different, and differences between departments are ok, as long as the SHARE members in each department have a say.
Most often, where SHARE encounters problems, it's not because of differences between departments, it's because of confusion. In some departments, the vacation policy is very clear because it's written down clearly. If a new manager or a group of SHARE members wants to change the policy because things have changed, they can involve everyone in that discussion. All good.
In other departments, however, the vacation policy isn't written down, and SHARE members get surprised by how it happens each year, or because changes get made without involving staff.
Developing a System for Clarifying and Including SHARE Member Input
SHARE is proposing that every department make sure they have a written policy for the parts of the contract that are left up to SHARE members and their managers to work out in the department. We'd avoid a lot of confusion and problems. SHARE and HR would provide help for any department having a tough time reaching a consensus agreement. We are working toward an agreement that would create deadlines and accountability in order to make sure these policies get documented.
(We also discussed absenteeism and the Massachusetts Earned Sick law at negotiations this week.)
Why the Gray?
SHARE represents almost two hundred job titles, in departments ranging from the tiny variety with two secretaries who work day shift, to enormous departments such as the Emergency Room, which has seventy-four SHARE members, in a variety of jobs, working shifts 24/7. That range leads to some complex challenges. For example, how do you write a vacation policy that would serve all those departments well, especially since they all start off with different ways of handling vacations?
SHARE's answer to that question is to emphasize the input of SHARE members in the department. The SHARE contract has always said that the way vacations are scheduled should be decided in the department, in discussions between the local SHARE members and the local managers. Our position has been that department policies will be different, and differences between departments are ok, as long as the SHARE members in each department have a say.
Most often, where SHARE encounters problems, it's not because of differences between departments, it's because of confusion. In some departments, the vacation policy is very clear because it's written down clearly. If a new manager or a group of SHARE members wants to change the policy because things have changed, they can involve everyone in that discussion. All good.
In other departments, however, the vacation policy isn't written down, and SHARE members get surprised by how it happens each year, or because changes get made without involving staff.
Developing a System for Clarifying and Including SHARE Member Input
SHARE is proposing that every department make sure they have a written policy for the parts of the contract that are left up to SHARE members and their managers to work out in the department. We'd avoid a lot of confusion and problems. SHARE and HR would provide help for any department having a tough time reaching a consensus agreement. We are working toward an agreement that would create deadlines and accountability in order to make sure these policies get documented.
(We also discussed absenteeism and the Massachusetts Earned Sick law at negotiations this week.)
Friday, August 12, 2016
Contract Negotiations 2016: Session #2
THIS WEEK, in a NUTSHELL
SHARE and UMass Memorial had our second contract negotiations session on Wednesday, August 10. As we reported last week, these negotiations continue to feel different from past negotiations. One key difference is the use of “co-facilitation,” a new process involving one union and one management leader to steer each discussion. This week we continued our focus on issues from the previous session:
- Interactions between SHARE members and supervisors and managers, which SHARE brought to the table. This week, Tod Wiesman (AVP, Performance, Learning, and Education) addressed the negotiators; he described the ideas that the hospital’s executive leadership is developing to train and cultivate hospital leaders.
- Increasing flexibility for cross-campus floating, which management brought to the table. This week, five front-line managers were brought in to describe their interests in floating SHARE employees. We also established an additional side table to drill down further on the issue of floating.
We started with 2 difficult issues, where managers and union leaders start from very different places. We are working to understand each other, and to try to find common ground.
For more info, read on...
For more info, read on...
WHY ARE THESE NEGOTIATIONS DIFFERENT?
Of course, every round of negotiations will feel different. In the three or so years between contracts, things change. Each negotiations, SHARE welcomes a few new members to its team, and misses a few from before. That said, our team remains relatively constant: a majority of our team members have negotiated before. On the flip side, UMass Memorial has an entirely new Executive Leadership team since our previous negotiations, and the leadership of the hospital’s Labor Relations department has completely turned over since our last negotiations. This results in a new management negotiating team. While many of the members of their team bring significant experience to the table, the leaders of their team are experiencing Interest Based Bargaining for the first time.
The teams at the main table are also bigger than we’ve had in the past. This has the advantage of people bringing experiences from a wide range of departments to the discussion. Management's team is a combination of Human Resources people, and front-line and middle managers.
Though we are trying to use Interest Based Bargaining, we can't leave history behind entirely, and it’s easy to fall into old habits of traditional bargaining. We’re all working to establish good foundations for ongoing relationships, as we tackle some of the most ambitious subjects SHARE has addressed in negotiations.
Though we are trying to use Interest Based Bargaining, we can't leave history behind entirely, and it’s easy to fall into old habits of traditional bargaining. We’re all working to establish good foundations for ongoing relationships, as we tackle some of the most ambitious subjects SHARE has addressed in negotiations.
A New Experiment: Co-Facilitation
One part of these negotiations that is new to everyone involved is “co-facilitation.” Our early training sessions and initial bargaining session were led by a facilitator, Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld. He trained two individuals from each side to act as neutrals, guiding the discussions about particular topics. The facilitators are:
- Myra Shah, UMMMC Human Resources
- Jeff Mogan, UMMMC Labor Relations
- Will Erickson, SHARE
- Elisabeth Szanto, SHARE
Although the facilitators each come from within the teams of negotiators, when they’re in the role of co-facilitator, they put on a different hat. Their job is to make sure that the conversation is flowing, and that we’re driving toward conclusions efficiently. They also help to make sure that notes are being captured accurately. (One other unique aspect of this negotiations is that notes are being taken and displayed, in real time, on an overhead projector.)
KEEP INVOLVED
We’ll keep the updates coming on the blog. To learn more, and weigh in about either of the topics we’ve discussed, and about what topics are coming up, please join us at an upcoming SHARE Information Meeting about Contract Negotiations.
Monday, August 8, 2016
SHARE Information meetings about Contract Negotiations
Contract negotiations have started. We are trying to finish
by October 1st. Join us to discuss what's happening in negotiations!
SHARE’s priorities come from the SHARE members who filled
out the SHARE survey last fall, and from SHARE info meetings and conversations
since then. The survey results are summarized here. The SHARE priorities are here as well
as on the statement that many SHARE members signed onto in the last couple of
months.
Info Meetings for SHARE
Members’ Input about Proposals
The specific proposals of how to make progress on those
priorities are being discussed at negotiations during August and September.
SHARE Info Meetings are a chance for you to hear what we are talking about and give
your opinions. Please join us at a meeting near you.
University: Thurs, August 11 11:30-1:30 Room
S2-309B (2nd floor of the Medical School)
Memorial: Fri, August 12 11:30-1:30 Nursing
conference room (toward the ED from the cafeteria)
Hahnemann: Mon, August 22 11:30-1:30 2nd floor conference room
67 Millbrook: Thurs, August 25 11:30-1:30 Thom
McAn conference room
306 Belmont: Fri, September 9 11:30-1:30 Conference room D
Tri-River: Fri, September 23 11:30-1:30 Community Room
306 Belmont: Fri, September 9 11:30-1:30 Conference room D
Tri-River: Fri, September 23 11:30-1:30 Community Room
These meetings are “rolling” meetings – come for whatever part
of the meeting is your lunch break. Feel free to bring your lunch, your
thoughts and questions, and a friend!
If you’d like to set up a meeting at a time and place that
works for you and your co-workers, call the SHARE office (508-929-4020,
extension 10) and leave a message.
Contract Negotiations 2016: Our First Session
SHARE and UMass Memorial had their first contract
negotiations session last Wednesday. For those of us on the SHARE Negotiating
Team who have negotiated several contracts before this, this session seemed
really different. Our training on Interest Based Bargaining, and our
choice to have a facilitator to run negotiations, are positive changes.
Here’s what we accomplished at our first session:
- Set up side tables to negotiations to work on specific issues.
- Mapped out a schedule of when each issue will be discussed. We’ve never done this before, and we think it will help make sure we are moving forward quickly.
- Began discussions about 2 issues:
- Interactions between SHARE members and supervisors and managers, which SHARE brought to the table.
- Increasing flexibility for cross-campus floating, which management brought to the table.
- We worked hard to understand each other’s interests in bringing this issue forward, and to begin brainstorm solutions that everyone might be able to agree to. No agreements were made on either issue yet.
For more info about either of these 2 topics and about what
topics are being discussed at negotiations, or to put in your opinion, please
join us at SHARE Information Meetings about Contract Negotiations.
Contract Negotiations Side Tables
This time, we are building on that success. Multiple side
tables will meet in the afternoons after the Main Table meets. These smaller
groups can focus on their issue and bring recommendations to the Main Table.
- Teams & Culture Side Table– This side table (who might change their name once they get started) is looking at examples of team-based work systems in other places to see what we want to try here at UMass Memorial. At Kaiser Permanente, unit based teams help groups do process improvement to make the work easier, and train everyone on how to work together as a team. SHARE believes a team structure also could improve how SHARE members and supervisors and managers work together, which was a big priority coming out of the SHARE member survey last fall (link to SHARE letter and survey results).
- Career Development Side Table – SHARE wants to increase ways for SHARE members to learn and grow in their jobs and to build careers at UMass Memorial. A group will also discuss how internal applications and transfers are working.
- In-patient PCA Staffing Side Table – This side table will look at how the patient care model is working on the inpatient floors. SHARE hopes to address PCAs’ concerns about how many patients they have to provide care for. (Staffing is a big concern for many SHARE members – we will be discussing staffing for other areas at the Main Table.)
- Call-Back and Sleep Time Side Table – This side table is tackling issues for SHARE members who take call.
- In addition, mini side table groups will discuss salary scales for peer-slotted titles in SHARE, the pension floor to protect lower paid SHARE members, and 401K auto-enrollment for new employees.
Contract Negotiations: Negotiating about How to Negotiate
In past Contract Negotiations, SHARE
has used a model of bargaining that begins with open conversation about
interests – what each side cared about. We’ve worked toward “expanding the pie”,
rather than fighting over who’s getting the bigger piece of pie. When we try to
focus on our common ground, we are more likely to find “win-win” solutions.
In these negotiations, SHARE is focusing on the day-to-day
experience of coming to work for SHARE members. Taking on this huge issue makes
it even more important that SHARE and management be able to negotiate
productively. SHARE and UMass Memorial management have agreed to use Interest
Based Bargaining to try to craft solutions for a better way of working at UMass
Memorial.
Our teacher and facilitator for these
trainings was Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld. He’s a professor at
the Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University. He
has studied labor-management partnership in the Kaiser Permanente hospital network. He also helped Ford and the United Auto Workers Union to form a Labor Management Partnership. That
partnership helped Ford so much they were the only major US automaker that
didn’t require federal funding during the recent industry bailout. More important to us than all his academic accomplishments: Joel’s been
a huge to both union and management in guiding us forward.
Sunday, August 7, 2016
Respect and What SHARE Members Think Makes a Good Supervisor or Manager
In the SHARE survey, 70% of SHARE
members rank respect and how department leaders treat people as a high priority
for improving their day-to-day experience at work, higher than any other item on
the list. In our survey, SHARE members had a lot to say about what makes
managers and supervisors helpful in making their department run better, as well
as what their managers could do better.
Here are some of the ideas the SHARE Negotiating Team
brought to the table in the discussion about how to improve supervisor and
manager interactions with SHARE members.
How some managers show respect and help the department run
better:
- Involve staff in decisions, ask our opinions
- Share information often & with everyone
- Pitch in when we are short-staffed
- Good listener, and available
- Open to new ideas
- Treat everyone fairly
- Help us fix problems
- Give recognition for hard work
What other managers do that does not help the department run
better:
- Micro-manage – not trust staff to do their jobs
- Favoritism: Treat some people better than others
- Criticize someone in front of co- workers or patients
- Think s/he knows best
- Not understanding the work we do
- “Run hot and cold” or add drama to the workplace
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






